Philosophy and Neuroscience: A Methodological Analysis
This book explores the methodological strategies for linking philosophy and neuroscience concerning the study of the conscious brain. The author focuses on four distinct methods for relating these two academic disciplines: isolationist, reductionist, neurophenomenological, and non-reductionist. After analyzing the pros and cons of these approaches,
Steven S. Gouveia applies them to the concept of Qualia and Information to understand how the metaphilosophical assumptions of each approach influence the definitions of those specific concepts. Gouveia argues for an approach that conceives the interdisciplinarity of both philosophy and neuroscience, in a particular and sound methodology, offering empirical examples of the explanatory power of this methodology over the others.
Additionally, he shows how the metaphilosophical assumptions of each methodology―usually taken by researchers implicitly and unconsciously―influence their own approach to the methodological problem.
“The relevance of neuroscience to philosophy is highly controversial but increasingly important.
Steven S. Gouveia’s book insightfully reviews four methodological approaches to philosophy and neuroscience: isolation, reduction, neurophenomenology, and non-reductive neurophilosophy. He plausibly argues for the advantages of the latter approach, shown in its applications to the self, emotions, and conscious experience. The result is a valuable contribution to the philosophy of mind and brain.” (Paul Thagard, Distinguished Professor Emeritus of Philosophy, University of Waterloo, Canada)
نقد و بررسیها0
هنوز بررسیای ثبت نشده است.